14th
July-Current Affairs
National Green Tribunal :
Ø The Supreme Court has agreed to examine whether the
National Green Tribunal (NGT) has the power to take cognisance of a matter
suo motu (on its own).
Ø Established in: 2010.
Ø Established under: National Green Tribunal Act 2010.
Consequent to enforcement of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, the
National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995 and the National Environment Appellate
Authority Act, 1997 have been repealed.
Ø What is it? It is a specialized body equipped
with the necessary expertise to handle environmental disputes involving
multi-disciplinary issues.
Ø Functions:
o Effective disposal of cases relating
to environmental protection and conservation of natural resources.
o Enforcement of any legal right relating
to environment.
o Giving relief for damages to persons
and property for related matters.
Ø Location: Initially, the NGT is proposed to be
set up at five places of sittings and will follow circuit procedure for making
itself more accessible.
o
New
Delhi is the Principal Place of Sitting of the Tribunal.
o
Bhopal,
Pune, Kolkata and Chennai shall be the other four place of sitting of the
Tribunal.
Ø Composition: The NGT Act, 2010 provides for a
Chairperson and a minimum of 10 Expert Members and equal number of Judicial
Members.
Ø Powers:
o
The
Tribunal has the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908.
o
The
Tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down under the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, but shall be guided by principles of natural justice.
o
The
Tribunal is mandated to make and endeavour for disposal of applications or
appeals finally within 6 months of filing of the same.
o
The
Tribunal has the original jurisdiction over all civil cases where a substantial
question relating to environment, including enforcement of any legal right
relating to environment is involved.
o
Appeal
against any order of the Tribunal shall lie to the Supreme Court.
Provenance:
Ø
Recently, Christie’s auctioned a stone head of
pharaoh Tutakhamen, amid protests by Egyptian authorities and activists. At
the heart of the controversy around the sale, which fetched $ 6 million, is the
question of ‘provenance’.
Ø In matters of antiques, the word
means “the record of the ownership of a movable work of art”.
Ø
When
provenance is unclear, museums and institutions of repute do not usually deal
with such works of art.
Ø
Over
100 countries are signatories to the UNESCO 1970 convention on the means of
prohibiting and preventing the illicit, export ad transport of ownership of
cultural property.
Ø For evidence of provenance, UNESCO
relies on INTERPOL database of stole objects and national inventories. When an
object is not listed, establishing its provenance becomes problematic.
Comments
Post a Comment