Skip to main content

ARE SMALLER STATES BETTER ?



The Indian model of federalism is markedly different from western classical idea of federation. While Article 1 of  Indian constitution, gives primacy to indestructible unity of  nation over constituting states, Art 2 and Art 3 empower the parliament to form / alter the boundaries of  the states or their names.

Demand for smaller states
The advent of  new millennium saw the creation of  three new states -- Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand (originally named Uttarakhand) and Jharkhand, carved out from the parent states of Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar and the recent statehood of  Telangana.

 More recently, India has witnessed a renewed assertion from historically constituted regions for the creation of smaller states.

The regions include Gorkhaland and Kamtapur in West Bengal; Coorg in Karnataka; Mithilanchal in Bihar; Saurashtra in Gujarat; Vidarbha in Maharashtra; Harit Pradesh, Purvanchal, Braj Pradesh and Awadh Pradesh in Uttar Pradesh and Bundelkhand comprising areas of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh.


The basis of assertion of new states
This renewed demand for smaller states can be attribute to four factors:

• First, electoral politics in the 'post-Congress polity' has been marked by the politicization and mobilization of  social cleavages along territorially confined lines of  caste, religion and region by state-level 'ethnic' parties. Symptomatic of the federalization of the party system, even the 'national' parties with distinct regional characters increasingly adhere to region specific electoral campaigns and policies.

• Second, centralized federalism under development-planning model failed to achieve its aim of  bringing about equitable development across and within the regional states Regional inequalities in terms of income and consumption and the constant feeling
of  neglect and discrimination in the peripheral regions.(e.g Telangana, Vidarbha and Marathawada) has forced people to demand new states.

• Thirdly  'secession of  the rich'regions attracting huge private investments and registering impressive growth,
have started resenting the dependence of  relatively underdeveloped regions on the revenues transferred to
them (for example, Harit Pradesh in Uttar Pradesh). Local elites complain of  'reverse' discrimination as
other politically dominant regions manage to corner financial deals/grants/lucrative portfolios. In response,
they want statehood with the full powers that entails

• Fourthly Shift in India's federal ideology:

• Regional identity, culture, and geographical differences now appear to be better recognized as valid bases for administrative division and political representation as democracy deepens and widens.

• Smaller states are being proposed on the grounds of good governance and development rather than merely on the linguistic or cultural principle.

• Recently even dialect communities have been asking for their own 'territorial homeland' while underlining the cultural and literary distinctiveness and richness of the dialect.

Arguments in favour of smaller states

Small is beautiful: Factual analysis shows the development and efficiency argument does work in favour of the new states when compared with the parent states.


 .
Better democratic Governance: Comparatively smaller but compact geographical entities tend to ensure that there is better democratic governance, as there is greater awareness among the policy makers about the local needs. Smaller spatial units having linguistic compatibility and cultural homogeneity also allow for better management, implementation and allocation of public resources in provisioning basic social and economic infrastructure services.

Decentralization, devolution and Democracy: The democratic polity of India is better served by smaller states  where decision making power is devolved to smaller regions, funds are devolved to people .Thus fulfilling democratic aspiration of  people.

Good Governance: Good governance means lesser government, responsive government, closer government,and quicker government.

Balanced regional development: It can be boon for the smaller region as it do not need to take load of the complete region. Now a small state can develop based on its own resources.


Arguments against smaller states:-

• The small States could also lead to the hegemony of the dominant community/caste/tribe over their
power structures. There can develop, in such States, an aggressive regionalism too leading to the growth of the sons-of-the-soil phenomenon and consequent intimidation of the migrants.

• The attainment of Statehood could also lead to emergence of intra-regional rivalries among the subregions as has happened in Himachal Pradesh, religious communities as in Punjab and castes/tribes as in Haryana and Manipur, if  the regional identity of  the new States remains weak due to demographic factors or historical reasons or their cultural backwardness.

• The creation of small States may also lead to certain negative political consequences. Since the strength of  the State legislature would be rather small in such States, the majority of  the ruling party or ruling coalition would remain fragile as the present situation in Uttarakhand.  In such a situation, a small group of legislators could make or break a government at will.

• There can be the risk of  centralisation of  powers in the hands of  the Chief  Minister, the members of his family and the chief  Minister's Secretariat would be rather greater. And, so would be the possibility of a Chief Minister turning the State into a political machine and himself becoming its boss merely by purchasing the support of  MLAs in one way or the other. The administration of  such States would tend to be highly personalised and politicised.

• The creation of  small States would lead to an appreciable increase in the inter-State water, power and boundary disputes.

• The division of states would require huge funds for building new capitals and maintaining a large number of  Governors, Chief  Ministers, Ministers and administrators as the case in division of  Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (establishment of  new capital at Amravati).

• It has often been pointed out that smaller states are better placed to administer and respond to the needs of  the state's citizens more nimbly.
Contrary to the argument , while small states of  Northeast have remained under developed, bigger states like Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown faster development. Clearly 'largeness' based on size or population alone is not a true deterrent for growth.


• In human development indicators also there is a mixed result where smaller states like Haryana, Punjab, Kerala and  bigger states like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, etc. top the list, indicating that Good Governance and not size , what determines development.

• The votaries of  'small 'states argue that small state administrations are quicker to respond. However, truth again lies somewhere in between. That small states may not be very prompt in responding was amply clear in the recent unfortunate floods of  Uttaranchal. However, some of  the worst terrorist attacks have taken place in 'large' states. Naxalism - affected 'small', 'large', 'old', 'new' states equally. Hence, this argument is perhaps is not convincing.

• Creation of smaller states only transfers power from the old state capital to new state capital without
empowering already existing institutions like  Gram Panchayat, District Collector, etc. development cannot be diffused to the backward areas of the states.


Conclusion
Though Indian constitution (and democratic polity) welcomes genuine regional aspirations, the plethora of demands for smaller states as a panacea for all developmental issues has created many administrative and political problems in recent times.
Hence a rational assessment of the factors behind the demand, based on Population size, geographical homogeneity, strategic nature of  the location etc should be done to consider the future demands for smaller states.

People must have a direct say in their development. This will address the problems of  displacement
and discontent among people and lead to balanced regional development.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Major Literary Works & Authors in Gupta Period

  Major Literary Works & Authors in Gupta Period The Gupta period was known as the Golden period of India in cultural development. It is considered as the one of the supreme and most outstanding times. Gupta Kings patronized the Sanskrit literature. They generously helped Sanskrit scholars and poets. Eventually Sanskrit language became the language of cultured and educated people. Kalidasa He was a Classical Sanskrit writer, extensively considered as the greatest poet and dramatist of Gupta Period. The six major works of Kalidasa are Abhijnanashakuntala Vikramorvashi Malavikagnimitra The epic poems Raghuvamsha Kumarasambhava Meghaduta Vishakhadatta The famous plays of Vishakhadatta are Mudrarakᚣhasa Mudrarakshasha means “Ring of the Demon” and it recites the ascent of Chandragupta Maurya to throne. Shudraka He is a king as well as poet The famous three Sanskrit plays contributed by him are Mrichchhakatika (The Little Clay Cart) Vinavasavadatta A bhana (short one-act monologue) ...

Organic Farming- Sikkim Case Study-GS-3

Organic Farming- Sikkim Case Study-Gs-3 In 2003,  Sikkim  officially adopted a resolution to switch to  organic farming . The state decided to go  organic , to ensure long-term sustenance of soil fertility, protection of environment and ecology. The objective was also to promote healthy living and decreasing the risk of disease . India’s first organic state Sikkim  has won the  ‘Oscar for best policies’  conferred by the  Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO)  for the world’s best policies promoting  agro-ecological and sustainable food systems.   The ‘Future Policy Award’ received by the  Chief Minister of Sikkim Pawan Kumar Chamling  in Rome on 15 Oct 2018 recognised the state’s leadership and political will to lead by example. The award was co-organized by  FAO, World Future Council and IFOAM- Organics International. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE   ORGANISATION (FAO) It is a specialized a...

Covid-19 Pandemic and Internal Migration in India

  Covid-19 Pandemic and Internal Migration in India List of Contents Introduction The amount of Internal Migrants in India Causes of Internal Migration in India Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on internal migration Impact of the pandemic on internal migrants Impact of the pandemic induced reverse migration on economy Suggestions for improving the conditions of internal migrants Conclusion Introduction As per the 2011 census, there are  450   million  (38% of the population) internal migrants in India. The World Bank report titled  ‘ Migration and Development Brief ’  mentions that nearly  40 million internal migrants  are affected by the Covid-19 Pandemic. Further, the Internal migrants in India faced various challenges in their migrated state, migration path and home state. The Covid-19 second wave is presently forcing states to implement lockdown. This once again highlighted the challenges faced by internal migrants in India. The amount of Internal ...